affirming a disjunct
The invalid form: P or Q; P; so not Q.
Affirming a disjunct is the formal fallacy: P or Q; P; therefore not Q. It imitates disjunctive syllogism but asserts a disjunct instead of denying one. Because logic's "or" is inclusive, both disjuncts may be true.
Examples
"The fuse blew or the bulb burned out. The fuse blew. So the bulb didn't burn out." Both may have failed.