Recipe
Integrate a definite integral by u-substitution
Use when: a definite integral \int_a^b f(g(x))g'(x)\,dx needs u-substitution, and the bounds a, b are given in terms of x
Goal: a single number, reached either by converting the bounds to u directly or by back-substituting to x before evaluating
Taught in U-substitution with definite integrals · extends Integrate by u-substitution
Quick recipe
-
1
Same as the indefinite case: let u be the inner function, and compute du.
Example
For \int_0^2 2x(x^2+1)\,dx: let u=x^2+1, so du=2x\,dx.
Why: nothing about having bounds changes how u and du are found. That part of the procedure is unchanged.
-
2
Pick one of two equally valid paths before continuing.
- converting the bounds — find the u-value matching each x-bound, then never return to x at all.
- back-substituting — treat this as an indefinite integral all the way through, substitute u back to x at the very end, and evaluate the ORIGINAL x-bounds on that result.
Why: both paths are correct. They differ only in bookkeeping, not in the answer they produce.
-
3
Replace the lower and upper bounds with their corresponding u-values.
Example
x=0 gives u=0^2+1=1; x=2 gives u=2^2+1=5. The integral becomes \int_1^5 u\,du.
Why: swapping the variable of integration means the bounds have to swap along with it. Leaving the old x-bounds on a u-integral would evaluate the wrong interval entirely.
-
4
Find the antiderivative in u, and plug the converted bounds straight in; no back-substitution is needed on this path.
Example
\int_1^5 u\,du=\left[\dfrac{u^2}{2}\right]_1^5=\dfrac{25}{2}-\dfrac12=12.
Why: once the bounds are already in terms of u, the antiderivative never needs to return to x at all — that's the entire advantage of converting them.
Common mistakes
- Converting the bounds to u-values, but then evaluating the antiderivative on the original x-bounds anyway.
- Back-substituting to x correctly, but then evaluating on the u-bounds instead of the original x-bounds.
- Mixing the two paths -- converting the bounds partway through, then also back-substituting.
- Forgetting that du needs the SAME constant-factor check from the base recipe before either path can proceed.