Every trig identity, by category
Every identity this course proves, sorted the way you'd actually reach for one.
Start from what you're allowed to rewrite. Reciprocal and quotient identities swap between the six trig functions; Pythagorean identities swap a squared function for one minus another. Even/odd and cofunction identities change the angle itself — negating it or complementing it. Sum and difference formulas build an unfamiliar angle from two familiar ones; double-angle, half-angle, and power-reduction identities are just that same idea specialized to related angles. Product-to-sum and sum-to-product are the pair you'll use least — reach for them only when a product or a sum is exactly what's in your way.
What counts as an identity
Term
identity
True for every value of the variable, not just some — that's what makes it safe to swap in either direction.
Reciprocal identities
Quotient identities
Pythagorean identities
For every angle \theta, \sin^2\theta + \cos^2\theta = 1.
The original — sin²θ + cos²θ = 1.
Show proof
The terminal side of \theta meets the unit circle at the point (\cos\theta, \sin\theta), and every point on the unit circle satisfies x^2 + y^2 = 1 by definition of the circle. Substitute x = \cos\theta and y = \sin\theta directly: \cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta = 1. That's the whole proof. No triangle, no case split for which quadrant \theta lands in — the unit-circle equation itself doesn't care, so neither does this identity.
Divide through by sin²θ or cos²θ to get the tangent/secant and cotangent/cosecant versions.
Even/odd and cofunction identities
Cosine and secant are even; the other four are odd.
Term
cofunction
Sum and difference formulas
For any angles \alpha and \beta, \cos(\alpha - \beta) = \cos\alpha\cos\beta + \sin\alpha\sin\beta.
Prove this one and the sine/tangent sum-and-difference versions follow from it.
Show proof
Place two points on the unit circle: P = (\cos\alpha, \sin\alpha) at angle \alpha from standard position, and Q = (\cos\beta, \sin\beta) at angle \beta. The angle between segments OP and OQ (where O is the origin) has measure \alpha - \beta. We'll compute the straight-line distance PQ two different ways and set the results equal.
Way 1 — the distance formula. PQ^2 = (\cos\alpha - \cos\beta)^2 + (\sin\alpha - \sin\beta)^2 Expand both squares: PQ^2 = \cos^2\alpha - 2\cos\alpha\cos\beta + \cos^2\beta + \sin^2\alpha - 2\sin\alpha\sin\beta + \sin^2\beta Regroup by point, and apply the Pythagorean identity to each point separately — \cos^2\alpha+\sin^2\alpha=1 since P is on the unit circle, and likewise for Q: PQ^2 = \underbrace{(\cos^2\alpha+\sin^2\alpha)}_{=\,1} + \underbrace{(\cos^2\beta+\sin^2\beta)}_{=\,1} - 2(\cos\alpha\cos\beta+\sin\alpha\sin\beta) = 2 - 2(\cos\alpha\cos\beta+\sin\alpha\sin\beta)
Way 2 — the Law of Cosines. Triangle OPQ has two sides of length 1 (both P and Q are on the unit circle, so OP = OQ = 1) enclosing an angle of measure \alpha-\beta. The Law of Cosines gives PQ^2 = OP^2 + OQ^2 - 2\cdot OP\cdot OQ\cdot\cos(\alpha-\beta) = 1 + 1 - 2\cos(\alpha-\beta) = 2 - 2\cos(\alpha-\beta) This route treats \alpha-\beta as an actual interior angle of a triangle, which only makes literal sense for 0<\alpha-\beta<\pi — Way 1 makes no such assumption at all (it's pure coordinate algebra, valid for every real \alpha,\beta), which is what actually earns the theorem's "for any angles" claim; Way 2 is included because the Law-of-Cosines route is the more memorable picture, not because it alone would suffice.
Set the two expressions for PQ^2 equal — they measure the same segment: 2 - 2(\cos\alpha\cos\beta+\sin\alpha\sin\beta) = 2 - 2\cos(\alpha-\beta) Subtract 2 from both sides, then divide by -2: \cos\alpha\cos\beta + \sin\alpha\sin\beta = \cos(\alpha-\beta) which is the identity, read right to left. \blacksquare
Note the crossed signs in the cosine line: a - on the left pairs with a + on the right, and vice versa. That crossing is exactly what trips people up. See the next check.
Double-angle identities
Show proof
Substitute \alpha=\beta=\theta into the sine sum formula \sin(\alpha+\beta)=\sin\alpha\cos\beta+\cos\alpha\sin\beta: \sin(2\theta) = \sin(\theta+\theta) = \sin\theta\cos\theta + \cos\theta\sin\theta = 2\sin\theta\cos\theta. The two middle terms are identical, so they combine by ordinary like-terms addition — not a new trig fact, just x + x = 2x wearing a trig costume.
For every angle \theta, \cos(2\theta) = \cos^2\theta - \sin^2\theta = 2\cos^2\theta - 1 = 1 - 2\sin^2\theta.
Three equivalent forms — pick whichever one matches what's already in the expression.
Show proof
Set \alpha=\beta=\theta in the cosine sum formula \cos(\alpha+\beta)=\cos\alpha\cos\beta-\sin\alpha\sin\beta: \cos(2\theta) = \cos(\theta+\theta) = \cos\theta\cos\theta - \sin\theta\sin\theta = \cos^2\theta - \sin^2\theta. That's the first form, and no further work is required — it's already a true statement about \cos(2\theta).
The other two forms come from a single substitution each, using the Pythagorean identity \sin^2\theta+\cos^2\theta=1. Replace \sin^2\theta with 1-\cos^2\theta: \cos(2\theta) = \cos^2\theta - \sin^2\theta = \cos^2\theta - (1-\cos^2\theta) = 2\cos^2\theta - 1. Or replace \cos^2\theta with 1-\sin^2\theta instead: \cos(2\theta) = \cos^2\theta - \sin^2\theta = (1-\sin^2\theta) - \sin^2\theta = 1 - 2\sin^2\theta. All three expressions equal \cos(2\theta); they're the same quantity written three ways, not three different facts.
Show proof
By the quotient identity, \tan(2\theta) = \dfrac{\sin(2\theta)}{\cos(2\theta)}. Substitute the sine and cosine double-angle forms just proved: \tan(2\theta) = \frac{2\sin\theta\cos\theta}{\cos^2\theta - \sin^2\theta} Divide every term, top and bottom, by \cos^2\theta — valid only once \cos\theta\neq0, i.e. \theta\neq\frac{\pi}{2}+k\pi, since dividing by \cos^2\theta is what introduces \tan\theta in the first place: \tan(2\theta) = \frac{\dfrac{2\sin\theta\cos\theta}{\cos^2\theta}}{\dfrac{\cos^2\theta}{\cos^2\theta} - \dfrac{\sin^2\theta}{\cos^2\theta}} = \frac{2\tan\theta}{1-\tan^2\theta} Two separate restrictions survive into the final form, for two different reasons. \theta \neq \frac{\pi}{2}+k\pi is carried over from the division step above — \tan\theta itself doesn't exist there, so the right-hand side can't even be evaluated, even though \tan(2\theta) on the left is perfectly fine (e.g. \theta=\frac{\pi}{2} gives \tan(2\theta)=\tan\pi=0). Separately, \tan\theta \neq \pm 1 keeps the denominator 1-\tan^2\theta away from 0 — and that condition is exactly \theta = \frac{\pi}{4}+k\frac{\pi}{2}, precisely where 2\theta itself has no tangent, so both sides genuinely agree there is no value to assign.
Half-angle and power-reduction identities
Double-angle cosine solved for sin²θ and cos²θ instead of cos(2θ).
Show proof
Start from \cos(2\theta) = 1 - 2\sin^2\theta. Subtract 1 from both sides, then multiply by -1: \cos(2\theta) - 1 = -2\sin^2\theta \quad\Longrightarrow\quad 1 - \cos(2\theta) = 2\sin^2\theta Divide both sides by 2: \sin^2\theta = \frac{1-\cos(2\theta)}{2} Start instead from \cos(2\theta) = 2\cos^2\theta - 1. Add 1 to both sides: \cos(2\theta) + 1 = 2\cos^2\theta Divide both sides by 2: \cos^2\theta = \frac{1+\cos(2\theta)}{2}
The sign in front of each radical is not a free choice and not always +. It's determined by which quadrant \dfrac{\theta}{2} itself falls in.
A square root away from power-reduction — the sign depends on which quadrant the half-angle lands in.
Show proof
Substitute \theta \to \dfrac{\theta}{2} into both power-reduction identities (so every 2\theta becomes \theta): \sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} = \frac{1-\cos\theta}{2}, \qquad \cos^2\frac{\theta}{2} = \frac{1+\cos\theta}{2} Square-rooting a squared quantity always produces a \pm — the square root property from Chapter 3 applies here exactly as it did to any equation of the form u^2 = k: \sin\frac{\theta}{2} = \pm\sqrt{\frac{1-\cos\theta}{2}}, \qquad \cos\frac{\theta}{2} = \pm\sqrt{\frac{1+\cos\theta}{2}} Dividing the two gives the tangent version, and it also simplifies to two radical-free forms, \tan\dfrac{\theta}{2} = \dfrac{1-\cos\theta}{\sin\theta} = \dfrac{\sin\theta}{1+\cos\theta}, which carry their own sign automatically — but the radical form above is the one that matches sine and cosine's pattern, and the one this course uses by default.
Product-to-sum and sum-to-product identities
Show proof
Write the cosine difference and sum formulas together: \cos(\alpha-\beta) = \cos\alpha\cos\beta+\sin\alpha\sin\beta, \qquad \cos(\alpha+\beta) = \cos\alpha\cos\beta-\sin\alpha\sin\beta Add them — the \sin\alpha\sin\beta terms cancel, leaving \cos\alpha\cos\beta doubled: \cos(\alpha-\beta)+\cos(\alpha+\beta) = 2\cos\alpha\cos\beta \implies \cos\alpha\cos\beta = \tfrac12\big[\cos(\alpha-\beta)+\cos(\alpha+\beta)\big] Subtract them instead — the \cos\alpha\cos\beta terms cancel, leaving \sin\alpha\sin\beta doubled: \cos(\alpha-\beta)-\cos(\alpha+\beta) = 2\sin\alpha\sin\beta \implies \sin\alpha\sin\beta = \tfrac12\big[\cos(\alpha-\beta)-\cos(\alpha+\beta)\big] The same add-and-cancel move on the sine sum and difference formulas, \sin(\alpha+\beta)=\sin\alpha\cos\beta+\cos\alpha\sin\beta and \sin(\alpha-\beta)=\sin\alpha\cos\beta-\cos\alpha\sin\beta, isolates the third identity above.