Recipe
Check a prediction with a partial truth table
Use when: you have guessed that one sentence is a tautology, a contradiction, or a contingency, and want to confirm or refute the guess without building every row
Goal: either one row that breaks the guess, or a clash showing that no such row exists
Taught in Predict, then check with partial truth tables
Quick recipe
-
1
Write down your guess and the value a breaking row would give the sentence: F for a tautology, T for a contradiction.
Example
Guessing that P \to (Q \to P) is a tautology means a breaking row would make it F.
Why: a guess is only worth checking if you know what would break it.
-
2
Give the main connective that value and fill in whatever the characteristic tables force, working inward.
Example
P \to (Q \to P) F forces P T and Q \to P F; then Q \to P F forces Q T and P F.
- a step forces one combination — write it down and keep going.
- a step allows several combinations — try each one in turn.
Why: each connective's table says which values of its parts produce the value you assumed.
-
3
Check whether any letter has been given both T and F.
- every option ends in a clash — no breaking row can exist, so the guess (tautology or contradiction) is confirmed.
- some option finishes with no clash — that option is a breaking row; the guess is wrong, and the row shows why.
Why: a clash means no row has the assumed value, which is what "true on every row" or "false on every row" requires.
Common mistakes
- Treating one row with the "right" value as proof of a tautology or a contradiction.
- Stopping after one branch of a step that allowed several combinations.
- Forgetting to check that a claimed breaking row really gives the sentence the value you assumed.