Skip to content
Free public beta until December 4, 2026: every course is open, no card needed. After that, the first chapter of each course stays free and full access is a one-time $39 ($19 for up to 100 founding members chosen for helpful feedback). Your progress is kept. How the beta works
Create a free account to open Graph traversal: BFS and DFS. The free chapters of Graph Theory stay readable without one.

Recipe

Find and apply an integrating factor for a non-exact equation

Use when: an equation M\,dx+N\,dy=0 fails the exactness test (M_y\ne N_x), and at least one of the two special-case ratios below simplifies to a function of a single variable

Goal: a factor \mu that restores exactness, so the exact-equation method solves the repaired equation

Taught in Integrating factors for non-exact equations

  1. 1

    Compute M_y and N_x; if they don't match, exactness fails and an integrating factor is needed.

    Example

    For 2xy\,dx+(y^2-x^2)\,dy=0: M=2xy, N=y^2-x^2. M_y=2x, N_x=-2x — these don't match, so the equation isn't exact as written.

    Why: there's no point hunting for \mu on an equation that's already exact.

  2. 2

    Compute this ratio and simplify; if every y cancels, \mu(x)=e^{\int (M_y-N_x)/N\,dx} works and Step 4 is next.

    Example

    \dfrac{M_y-N_x}{N}=\dfrac{2x-(-2x)}{y^2-x^2}=\dfrac{4x}{y^2-x^2} — this still has both x and y in it after simplifying, so it's not a function of x alone.

    • the ratio simplifies to a function of x alone — \mu(x) is found; skip to Step 4.
    • the ratio still involves y — move on to Step 3 and test the other ratio.

    Why: this ratio is exactly what demanding exactness after multiplying by \mu(x) forces \mu to satisfy — when it collapses to one variable, that variable's own equation for \mu is solvable by separation.

  3. 3

    Compute this second ratio; if every x cancels, \mu(y)=e^{\int (N_x-M_y)/M\,dy} works instead.

    Example

    \dfrac{N_x-M_y}{M}=\dfrac{-2x-2x}{2xy}=\dfrac{-4x}{2xy}=\dfrac{-2}{y} — every x cancelled, leaving a function of y alone.

    Why: this is the mirror image of Step 2's test — a non-exact equation can be repaired from EITHER side, and typically only one of the two ratios simplifies.

  4. 4

    Integrate whichever single-variable expression simplified, exponentiate to get \mu, multiply the ENTIRE original equation by it, then recheck M_y=N_x on the new M and N.

    Example

    \mu(y)=e^{\int(-2/y)\,dy}=e^{-2\ln y}=y^{-2}=\dfrac1{y^2}. Multiplying through: new M=\dfrac{2x}{y}, new N=1-\dfrac{x^2}{y^2}. Checking: M_y=-\dfrac{2x}{y^2}, N_x=-\dfrac{2x}{y^2} — they match, so \boxed{\mu(y)=\dfrac1{y^2}\ \text{repairs the equation}}

    Why: the whole point of finding \mu was to reach an exact equation the previous two sections already know how to solve — this check confirms the repair actually worked before moving on.

Common mistakes

  • Multiplying only M or only N by \mu, instead of the entire equation.
  • Mixing up the two tests — using M_y-N_x in the denominator-M test, or forgetting the sign flip between the two ratios.
  • Stopping after computing \mu without ever rechecking exactness on the repaired equation.
  • Concluding "no integrating factor exists" as soon as the first ratio fails, without trying the second.