Skip to content
Free public beta until December 4, 2026: every course is open, no card needed. After that, the first chapter of each course stays free and full access is a one-time $39 ($19 for up to 100 founding members chosen for helpful feedback). Your progress is kept. How the beta works

Recipe

Solve a separable first-order equation

Use when: the equation can be written as \dfrac{dy}{dx}=f(x)g(y) — every y-term collects on one side, every x-term on the other

Goal: an implicit or explicit solution for y, plus any equilibrium solutions the separation step would otherwise lose

Taught in Separable equations

  1. 1

    Rewrite \dfrac{dy}{dx}=f(x)g(y) as \dfrac{dy}{g(y)}=f(x)\,dx.

    Example

    Take \dfrac{dy}{dx}=xy(2-y), so f(x)=x and g(y)=y(2-y). Separating: \dfrac{dy}{y(2-y)}=x\,dx

    Why: this is legal exactly because the original equation already factors into a pure function of x times a pure function of y — nothing besides regrouping happens here.

  2. 2

    Dividing by g(y) assumes g(y)\ne0; find every root of g(y)=0 before moving on.

    Example

    Here g(y)=y(2-y), so g(y)=0 exactly when y=0 or y=2. Both roots have to be checked against the original equation once the rest of the recipe is done.

    Why: each root of g(y)=0 gives a constant solution y=c that the separation step silently excludes — it has to be checked separately, not discovered by accident.

  3. 3

    Integrate \displaystyle\int\dfrac{dy}{g(y)}=\int f(x)\,dx independently.

    Example

    \dfrac1{y(2-y)} splits by partial fractions into \dfrac12\left(\dfrac1y+\dfrac1{2-y}\right), so \int\dfrac12\left(\dfrac1y+\dfrac1{2-y}\right)dy=\int x\,dx \;\Longrightarrow\; \dfrac12\ln|y|-\dfrac12\ln|2-y|=\dfrac{x^2}{2}+C_1 Multiplying by 2 and combining the logs: \ln\left|\dfrac{y}{2-y}\right|=x^2+C_2, so \dfrac{y}{2-y}=Ae^{x^2} for a renamed constant A.

    Why: once the variables are apart, each side is an ordinary single-variable integral.

  4. 4

    Isolate y only if the algebra stays clean; an implicit equation in x and y is a complete, legitimate answer on its own.

    Example

    Here the algebra does stay clean: cross-multiplying \dfrac{y}{2-y}=Ae^{x^2} gives y=Ae^{x^2}(2-y), so y+Ae^{x^2}y=2Ae^{x^2}, and y=\dfrac{2Ae^{x^2}}{1+Ae^{x^2}} If y(0)=1 is given, substituting x=0,\,y=1 gives 1=\dfrac{2A}{1+A}, so A=1, and \boxed{y=\dfrac{2e^{x^2}}{1+e^{x^2}}}

    Why: forcing an implicit relation into y=f(x) form is a separate task from solving the equation, not a required last step.

  5. 5

    Substitute each root of g(y)=0 from Step 2 back into the ORIGINAL, unseparated equation.

    Example

    Substituting y=0: left side \dfrac{dy}{dx}=0, right side x\cdot0\cdot(2-0)=0 — solves it. Substituting y=2: left side 0, right side x\cdot2\cdot(2-2)=0 — also solves it. So y=0 and y=2 are genuine equilibrium solutions, alongside the family found in Step 4.

    Why: this is what confirms whether a constant solution is genuinely new, rather than already hiding inside the general family for some value of C.

Common mistakes

  • Dividing by g(y) without ever checking g(y)=0, silently dropping a constant solution.
  • Treating an implicit answer as unfinished when no clean algebraic step actually isolates y.
  • Forgetting the constant of integration, or dropping it once one side becomes a logarithm.
  • Checking the constant solution against the separated equation instead of the original one — the separated form is exactly where that solution was excluded.