Recipe
Write and use the general solution of a linear homogeneous equation
Use when: you have two solutions y_1,y_2 of y''+p(x)y'+q(x)y=0 and need the complete solution set, possibly pinned down by initial conditions
Goal: the general solution y=C_1y_1+C_2y_2, and — if conditions are given — the one specific solution matching them
Taught in The general solution of a linear homogeneous equation
Quick recipe
-
1
Check that both functions actually solve the equation, then confirm they're independent by computing W(y_1,y_2) and checking it's nonzero at one point.
Example
For y''+y'-2y=0: y_1=e^x and y_2=e^{-2x} each solve the equation, and W=e^x(-2e^{-2x})-e^x(e^{-2x})=-3e^{-x}, nonzero for every x.
Why: this section's theorem — that y=C_1y_1+C_2y_2 accounts for every solution — only applies once y_1,y_2 are confirmed to be an actual fundamental set, not just any two solutions.
-
2
With a confirmed fundamental set, the general solution is y=C_1y_1+C_2y_2, with C_1,C_2 left as arbitrary constants.
Example
y=C_1e^{x}+C_2e^{-2x}Why: this section's theorem states that this two-parameter family accounts for every solution of the equation, with nothing else left to find.
-
3
Check whether the problem hands you a starting value and slope to pin the constants down, or just asks for the general family.
Example
For y(0)=3, y'(0)=-3: y(0)=C_1+C_2=3, and since y'=C_1e^{x}-2C_2e^{-2x}, y'(0)=C_1-2C_2=-3.
- two conditions are given (e.g. y(x_0), y'(x_0)) — proceed to the system below.
- no conditions are given — the general solution above is already the final answer; stop here.
Why: two arbitrary constants need exactly two independent conditions to be pinned down to a single, specific solution.
-
4
Solve the pair of equations for C_1,C_2, then substitute back into y.
Example
Subtracting the second equation from the first: 3C_2=6, so C_2=2, and then C_1=1. \boxed{y=e^{x}+2e^{-2x}}
Why: the general solution is a whole family of curves; the conditions pick out the one curve that actually matches the problem.
Common mistakes
- Writing y=C_1y_1+C_2y_2 without ever checking W\ne0 — two solutions that happen to be dependent don't form a fundamental set, and the theorem doesn't apply to them.
- Solving for C_1,C_2 using only y(x_0) — one equation can't pin down two constants; y'(x_0) is required too.
- Forgetting to differentiate the general solution before substituting x_0 into the second condition.
- Treating the general solution as one particular answer instead of the entire two-parameter family it actually is.