Skip to content
Free public beta until December 4, 2026: every course is open, no card needed. After that, the first chapter of each course stays free and full access is a one-time $39 ($19 for up to 100 founding members chosen for helpful feedback). Your progress is kept. How the beta works

Which vector calculus theorem applies here?

Green's, Stokes', Divergence, or the Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals — one family, four faces.

All four are the same idea — what happens on a region's BOUNDARY is controlled by what happens throughout its INTERIOR — specialized to a different dimension and a different kind of integral. Match your integral's shape to a row below rather than trying to remember four unrelated formulas.

A curve is the boundary — of what?

Let C be a smooth curve from point A to point B, parametrized by \mathbf{r}(t) for t \in [a,b] with \mathbf{r}(a) = A, \mathbf{r}(b) = B. If f is differentiable and \nabla f is continuous on an open region containing C, then \int_C \nabla f \cdot d\mathbf{r} = f(B) - f(A).

Example

\int_C \nabla f\cdot d\mathbf{r} = f(\text{end})-f(\text{start}) — a curve's two ENDPOINTS are its boundary.
Show proof

By the chain rule, \dfrac{d}{dt}f(\mathbf{r}(t)) = \nabla f(\mathbf{r}(t)) \cdot \mathbf{r}'(t). So \int_C \nabla f \cdot d\mathbf{r} = \int_a^b \nabla f(\mathbf{r}(t)) \cdot \mathbf{r}'(t)\, dt = \int_a^b \frac{d}{dt}f(\mathbf{r}(t))\, dt = f(\mathbf{r}(b)) - f(\mathbf{r}(a)) = f(B) - f(A), the last step being the ordinary single-variable Fundamental Theorem of Calculus applied to the scalar function t \mapsto f(\mathbf{r}(t)).

A vector field that is someone's gradient — its line integral between two points never depends on the path taken.

Let C be a positively oriented (counterclockwise), piecewise-smooth, simple closed curve in the plane, and let R be the region it encloses. If P and Q have continuous first partial derivatives on an open region containing R, then \oint_C P\,dx + Q\,dy = \iint_R \left(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\right) dA.

Equivalently, writing \mathbf{F} = P\,\mathbf{i} + Q\,\mathbf{j}, the circulation form is \oint_C \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{r} = \iint_R \operatorname{curl} \mathbf{F}\, dA, trading a circulation integral around the boundary for a curl integral over the whole enclosed region.

Example

\oint_C \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{r} = \iint_D (\partial Q/\partial x - \partial P/\partial y)\,dA — a closed curve is the boundary of the flat REGION it encloses.
Show proof

Sketch for a region R that is both x-simple and y-simple (the general case patches finitely many such regions together, with the shared interior edges canceling since each is traversed once in each direction). Write R = \{(x,y) : a \le x \le b,\ g_1(x) \le y \le g_2(x)\}. Then \iint_R -\frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\, dA = -\int_a^b \big[P(x,g_2(x)) - P(x,g_1(x))\big]\, dx, by the single-variable Fundamental Theorem applied to the inner integral. The right side is exactly \oint_C P\,dx, splitting C into its bottom piece y=g_1(x) (traversed left to right) and top piece y=g_2(x) (traversed right to left, contributing the minus sign). The same argument with R described as y-simple gives \iint_R \frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}\, dA = \oint_C Q\,dy. Adding the two established identities gives the theorem.

Trades a circulation integral around a closed curve for a double integral of curl over the region it encloses.

A closed curve as the boundary of a surface

Let S be an oriented, piecewise-smooth surface bounded by a simple, closed, piecewise-smooth curve C, with C's orientation matching S's unit normal \mathbf{n} by the right-hand rule. (Curl the fingers of the right hand along C's direction of travel, and the thumb points along \mathbf{n}.) If \mathbf{F} has continuous first partial derivatives on an open region containing S, then \oint_C \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{r} = \iint_S \operatorname{curl} \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S}, trading a curve's circulation for a surface's curl-flux.

Example

\oint_C \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{r} = \iint_S (\nabla\times\mathbf{F})\cdot d\mathbf{S} — Green's Theorem lifted one dimension, for a curve bounding a curved surface, not just a flat region.
Show proof

Sketch for S a graph z=g(x,y) over a region R in the xy-plane, with C the boundary of R lifted onto the graph. Parametrize S by (x,y)\mapsto(x,y,g(x,y)), so d\mathbf{S} = (-g_x,-g_y,1)\,dA. Writing out \operatorname{curl}\mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S} in terms of P, Q, R and their partials, then substituting z=g(x,y) throughout, the right side reduces — after applying the multivariable chain rule to track how P and Q change along the lifted curve — to exactly \oint_{\partial R} \big[P(x,y,g(x,y))+R(x,y,g(x,y))g_x\big]\,dx + \big[Q(x,y,g(x,y))+R(x,y,g(x,y))g_y\big]\,dy, which the circulation form of Green's Theorem converts into a double integral over R identical to the one obtained by substituting z=g(x,y) into the left-hand side's curl-flux integrand directly. A general piecewise-smooth S is patched together from finitely many such graphs, with shared interior edges canceling since each is traversed once in each direction.

Lifts Green's tangential form off the flat plane: a curve's circulation traded for curl integrated as flux through any curved surface it bounds.

A closed surface as the boundary of a solid

Let E be a solid region in space bounded by a closed, piecewise-smooth surface S=\partial E, oriented outward. If \mathbf{F} has continuous first partial derivatives on an open region containing E, then \oiint_S \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S} = \iiint_E \operatorname{div} \mathbf{F}\, dV, trading a closed surface's flux for a solid's divergence integral.

Example

\iint_S \mathbf{F}\cdot d\mathbf{S} = \iiint_E (\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F})\,dV — a closed surface is the boundary of the SOLID it encloses.
Show proof

Sketch for E a solid that is simultaneously x-simple, y-simple, and z-simple (a general E patches together finitely many such pieces, with shared interior faces canceling since each is traversed with opposite outward normals from the two adjoining pieces). It suffices to prove the three component identities separately and add them; take the z-component. Write E=\{(x,y,z): (x,y)\in R,\ h_1(x,y)\le z\le h_2(x,y)\}. Then \iiint_E \frac{\partial R}{\partial z}\, dV = \iint_R \big[R(x,y,h_2(x,y)) - R(x,y,h_1(x,y))\big]\, dA by the single-variable Fundamental Theorem applied to the inner integral. The right side is exactly the flux of R\,\mathbf{k} through S's top piece z=h_2(x,y) (outward normal has positive z-component) plus its bottom piece z=h_1(x,y) (outward normal has negative z-component, contributing the minus sign) — the side faces of E, if any, are vertical and contribute nothing to a \mathbf{k}-component flux. The same argument for the other two components, summed, gives the theorem.

Trades a closed surface's total flux for a triple integral of divergence over the solid region it encloses.

Seeing all four as one theorem

Graph settings

Calculator